| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2016 | Volume
: 8
| Issue : 1 | Page : 27-33 |
|
|
Awareness of Consumer Protection Act among the dental fraternity in India
Lingam Amara Swapna1, Pradeep Koppolu2, Tarakji Basil1, Deepak Koppolu3, Kusai Baroudi2
1 Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Al-Farabi Colleges, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi Colleges, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Clinical Research, George Clinical, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Lingam Amara Swapna
Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Al-Farabi Colleges, Riyadh
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0975-8844.181924
|
|
|
Background: The medical and dental professionals have been included in the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) to shield the patients in case of any unethical treatment given by the doctor. Though there is ample literature regarding the CPA and its importance, insufficient data is available from the Indian subcontinent regarding the awareness of dentists in India and the problems faced by them in clinical practice. Thus, there is a need to know the awareness of the dental fraternity in India and their knowledge about CPA. Objective: To evaluate the knowledge, awareness, and practices regarding the CPA among dental professionals in India. Materials and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a total of 467 dental professionals (198 males, 269 females) comprising (117) Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) practitioners, (114) Master of Dental Surgery (MDS) practitioners, (104) interns, and (79) postgraduate (PG) students were surveyed using a self-administered structured electronic questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised 20 questions about the awareness of CPA and whether these professionals were following the recommendations of CPA. Chi-square test was used to know the significance. Results: The CPA awareness scores were significantly higher among MDS practitioners when compared with those of BDS practitioners, interns, and postgraduates. Almost 66% of the participants found the taking of written consent to be time-consuming. Nearly 70% and 69.3% of the BDS and MDS practitioners, respectively, were updating the medical ethics. Conclusion: Considering the present scenario, a better understanding of CPA is necessary for dentists in order to be on the safer side and an educational program would be helpful to increase the knowledge and confidence of dentists in any medical legal jurisprudence to avoid any litigation. |
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
